data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e79/b7e7998c748daf38f87950ec68c2d92594c076ba" alt="I hate it when the waiter acts friendly. Even though I know it's fake, it reminds me that some people enjoy social interaction. A philosophy webcomic about the inevitable anguish of living a brief life in an absurd world. Also Jokes"
467
Humean Child Raising
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7d5d/b7d5d86dbcfc04f9277f13149c681b0f7ac7149f" alt="Also...God isn't real, just so you know."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acca7/acca777d74630e7b9d07aba0e197e78657fe6c3b" alt="Follow on bluesky for the jokes too stupid to even make comics out of Follow on bluesky"
Make sure to follow me on BlueSky
David Hume is most famous for not believing that there was any ultimately rational reason to believe in inductive reasoning. So theoretically, his child should take no more heed of being told something "a thousand times" than once. He also thought there was no rational reason to be moral, and morality was just a kind of sentiment that we felt, so Santa might just one day feel like not giving presents to the good kids anymore, and no recourse to logic could dissuade him. His argument against miracles was essentially that a miracle was an observation that went against the "laws of nature". But the laws of nature as we understand are just what we have observed to happen, so reports of miracles are by their very nature a tiny minority report of what usually occurs - an outlier. If we are to apply our normal reasoning process for empiricism, we should then discard them, always, since the number of observations that goes against them always outnumbers the number for them.
David Hume is most famous for not believing that there was any ultimately rational reason to believe in inductive reasoning. So theoretically, his child should take no more heed of being told something "a thousand times" than once. He also thought there was no rational reason to be moral, and morality was just a kind of sentiment that we felt, so Santa might just one day feel like not giving presents to the good kids anymore, and no recourse to logic could dissuade him. His argument against miracles was essentially that a miracle was an observation that went against the "laws of nature". But the laws of nature as we understand are just what we have observed to happen, so reports of miracles are by their very nature a tiny minority report of what usually occurs - an outlier. If we are to apply our normal reasoning process for empiricism, we should then discard them, always, since the number of observations that goes against them always outnumbers the number for them.
Permanent Link to this Comic: https://existentialcomics.com/comic/276
Support the comic on Patreon!